Rethinking Arithmetic Learning Difficulties: A Thematic Review of Challenges and Teaching Strategies in Primary Islamic Education
Keywords:
Arithmetic Operations, Mathematics Learning, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Numeracy Skills, Contextual LearningAbstract
Arithmetic operations are among the most fundamental topics in mathematics education and serve as the foundation for mastering more advanced mathematical concepts. In Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, students are expected to develop proficiency in addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division as essential components of numeracy skills. This study aims to examine the challenges encountered by students in learning arithmetic operations and to identify effective instructional strategies that can enhance their numeracy skills. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach through literature review and analysis of mathematics learning practices at the elementary school level. Data were analyzed thematically to identify factors influencing students’ success in learning arithmetic operations. The findings indicate that students commonly experience difficulties related to place value understanding, procedural errors in calculations, limited mastery of multiplication facts, and challenges in solving word problems. Both internal factors, such as learning motivation, self-confidence, and cognitive readiness, and external factors, including teaching methods, instructional media, and family support, contribute to students’ learning outcomes. The use of concrete learning materials, educational games, contextual learning activities, and interactive instructional approaches was found to improve students’ conceptual understanding and computational skills.
Abstrak
Operasi hitung bilangan merupakan salah satu materi dasar matematika yang sangat penting dalam pembelajaran di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah karena menjadi fondasi bagi penguasaan konsep matematika yang lebih kompleks. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji berbagai permasalahan yang dihadapi siswa dalam mempelajari operasi hitung bilangan serta mengidentifikasi strategi pembelajaran yang efektif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan numerasi mereka. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi literatur dan analisis praktik pembelajaran matematika di tingkat sekolah dasar. Data dianalisis secara tematik untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi keberhasilan pembelajaran operasi hitung bilangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesulitan siswa meliputi rendahnya pemahaman konsep nilai tempat, kesalahan prosedural dalam operasi hitung, kurangnya penguasaan fakta perkalian, serta kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita. Faktor internal seperti motivasi belajar, kepercayaan diri, dan kesiapan kognitif serta faktor eksternal seperti metode pembelajaran, media pembelajaran, dan dukungan keluarga turut memengaruhi hasil belajar siswa. Penggunaan media konkret, permainan edukatif, pembelajaran kontekstual, serta pendekatan pembelajaran yang interaktif terbukti mampu meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan berhitung siswa.
References
Arifin, Nurdin, and Eudia Fortuna. “Etnomatematika Pada Kebudayaan Suku Dayak Bentian Dalam Menumbuh Kembangkan Literasi Matematis.” Jurnal Pengabdian Ahmad Yani 1, no. 1 (2021): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.53620/pay.v1i1.16.
Azura, Yuni, Hadi Thoyib, and Suhendry. “Pengenalan Kalimah Isim Surah Al-Fatihah Bagi Anak.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Pembangunan Sosial, Desa Dan Masyarakat Volume 6 (2025): 229–37.
Azura, Yuni, Hadi Thoyib, Yulia Meilinda, Iit Fransiska, and Saidatul Munawwaroh. “Integrasi Deep Learning Dan Pendekatan Kontruktivisme Untuk Penguatan Karakter Islami Di Era Pembelajaran Abad 21.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 13, no. 2 (2025): 360–73. https://doi.org/10.46368/jpd.v13i2.4749.
Bawadi, Sanggiti, Heni Pujiastuti, and Maman Fathurrohman. “Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Dengan Teknik Scaffoldıng: Systematic Literature Review.” MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran 9, no. 1 (2023): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202391.2.
Effendy, Femmy, Vanessa Gaffar, Ratih Hurriyati, and Heny Hendrayati. “Penggunaan Pembayaran Seluler Dengan VOSviewer.” Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi 16, no. 1 (2021): 10–17. https://e-journal.rosma.ac.id/index.php/interkom/article/view/92.
Gamage, Kelum A. A., Sakunthala Yatigammana Ekanayake, and Shyama C. P. Dehideniya. “Embedding Sustainability in Learning and Teaching: Lessons Learned and Moving Forward—Approaches in STEM Higher Education Programmes.” Education Sciences 12, no. 3 (March 19, 2022): 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030225.
Hakim, Arif Rahman, and Fauzi Mulyatna. “Sejarah Matematika: Perkembangan Bilangan Matematika Empiris.” Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 9, no. 80 (2023): 471–78. https://proceeding.unindra.ac.id/index.php/DPNPMunindra/article/view/6555.
Haryani, M, R Wahyuningtyas, Z N Sakinah, and B E Susilo. “Studi Literatur: Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Augmented Reality Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Guna Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa.” PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 7 (2024): 359–67. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/prisma/article/view/2975.
Herlina, Sari, and Dadang Juandi. “Systematics Literature Review: Pengembangan Mathematical Proficiency Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika.” Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 6, no. 2 (2022): 2122–33. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1417.
Junedi, Beni, St. Budi Waluya, and Wardono. “The Programme for International Student Assessment: Tinjauan Literasi Matematika Dan Implementasi Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di Indonesia.” PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 7 (2024): 834–40. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/prisma/article/view/3037.
Karim, Arifin, and Joko Soebagyo. “Pemetaan Bibliometrik Terhadap Trend Riset Matematika Terapan Di Google Scolar Menggunakan Vosviewer.” Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika 6, no. 2 (September 30, 2021): 234–41. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v6i2.5835.
Lombardi, Doug, Thomas F. Shipley, Janelle M. Bailey, Paulo S. Bretones, Edward E. Prather, Cissy J. Ballen, Jennifer K. Knight, et al. “The Curious Construct of Active Learning.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 22, no. 1 (April 19, 2021): 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974.
Ningsih, Prapti Octavia, Nor Ainun, Tia Mardianis, Ezra Alda, and Salsabila Putri. “Implementasi Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Genially Untuk Meningkatkan.” Al-Irsyad Journal of Mathematics Education 5, no. 1 (January 12, 2026): 352–64. https://doi.org/10.58917/ijme.v5i1.566.
Ningsih, Prapti Octavia, Eko Parnandes, Wulandari. Tantri, and Nor Ainun. “Aktualisasi Nilai Al-Qur’an Bagi Generasi Muda Yang Berkulitas Dan Berwawasan.” ABDISOSHUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Sosial Dan Humaniora 4, no. 2 (June 9, 2025): 140–50. https://doi.org/10.55123/abdisoshum.v4i2.5028.
Prabowo, Agung, Agus Sugandha, Mashuri Mashuri, Suroto Suroto, Sehah Sehah, and Bambang Hendriya Guswantoro. “Penyuluhan Cara Meneliti Dan Menulis Hasil Penelitian Bidang Matematika Bagi Guru-Guru MGMP Matematika SMP Kabupaten Banyumas.” ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 2, no. 9 (July 18, 2023): 4100–4106. https://doi.org/10.56799/jim.v2i9.2119.
Rahmadhani, Elfi. “Ethnomathematics Dan Permainan Tradisional Dalam Pendidikan Matematika.” JPMI – Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif 5, no. 1 (2022): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i1.81-94.
Rahmaini, Nurul, and Salsabila Ogylva Chandra. “Pentingnya Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika.” Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application 4, no. 1 (March 29, 2024): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v4i1.420.
Risma Chulashotud Diana, Dedi Kuswandi, Saida Ulfa. “Kuliah Model Pengembangan Kurikulum.” JKTP Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan 2, no. 2 (2019): 90–95.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan RD. Cet. ke 23. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2016.
Supinah, Roslani, and Joko Soebagyo. “Analisis Bibliometrik Terhadap Tren Penggunaan ICT Pada Pembelajaran Matematika.” JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika) 6, no. 2 (2022): 276. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i2.6153.
Suryati, Nunung, Dedi Kuswandi, Punaji Setyosari, Hutkemri, Tutut Chusniyah, Risma Chulashotud Diana, and Eko Saputra Nurdiansa. “Curriculum Development of Postgraduate Study Program Based on Life-Based Learning Philosophy and Disruption Technology.” In International Conference On Information Technology And Education (ICITE 2020) Curriculum, 508:434–36, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.273.
Tella, Adedeji, and Folasade Amina Sulaimon. “Improving Pupils’ Achievement in Fraction Using Inquiry-Based Instructional Strategy Enriched with Origami Activities.” Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5, no. 3 (2022): 285–96. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v5i3.12183.
Winardi, Sunaryo, Gunawan, Frans Mikael Sinaga, Farrell Rio Fa, Cindy Sintiya, and Jikky. “Penggunaan Mobilenet Untuk Intelligent Character Recognition (Icr) Penilaian Otomatis Operasi Matematika Dasar.” Jurnal TIMES 12, no. 2 (December 18, 2023): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.51351/jtm.12.2.2023707.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dafa Nofriyanti, Haikal, Rani Sulistriani, Rini Febriani, Tri Wulan Safitri (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial purposes.
- Adaptation — mixing, changing, and developing materials for any purpose, even commercial ones.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
