The Harmonization of National and Customary Law in Regulating Marriage in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis
(Harmonisasi Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Adat dalam Pengaturan Perkawinan di Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Komparatif)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12026/sym.v1i1.113Keywords:
Comparative Analysis, Customary Law, Indonesia, Marriage, National LawAbstract
Marriage law in Indonesia occupies a unique position at the intersection of national and customary legal systems. The country’s cultural, religious, and value diversity makes marriage regulation not merely a matter of formal legality but also of social and moral legitimacy within communities. The tension between these two legal systems often raises issues concerning the validity, procedures, and legal consequences of marriage. This study aims to comparatively analyze the similarities, differences, and opportunities for harmonization between national and customary law in regulating marriage. Data were collected through library research involving statutory regulations, court decisions, and relevant academic literature, then analyzed using a normative juridical approach with a qualitative-comparative method. The findings indicate that national law emphasizes legal certainty and equality, whereas customary law focuses on kinship values and social balance. Despite their differences, both share the same goal of establishing a harmonious family. Therefore, their harmonization should be strengthened through adaptive legal reforms that respect cultural diversity and uphold justice and human rights principles.
Abstrak
Perkawinan di Indonesia merupakan ranah hukum yang unik karena berada pada persimpangan antara hukum nasional dan hukum adat. Keberagaman budaya, agama, dan sistem nilai menjadikan pengaturan perkawinan tidak hanya persoalan legalitas formal, tetapi juga berkaitan dengan legitimasi sosial dan moral dalam masyarakat. Ketegangan antara kedua sistem hukum ini kerap menimbulkan persoalan mengenai keabsahan, tata cara, dan akibat hukum suatu perkawinan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis secara komparatif persamaan, perbedaan, serta peluang harmonisasi antara hukum nasional dan hukum adat dalam pengaturan perkawinan. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, serta literatur akademik yang relevan, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan metode kualitatif-komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum nasional menekankan kepastian dan kesetaraan hukum, sementara hukum adat berorientasi pada nilai kekeluargaan dan keseimbangan sosial. Meskipun berbeda dalam bentuk dan mekanisme, keduanya memiliki tujuan yang sama untuk membentuk keluarga yang harmonis. Karena itu, harmonisasi keduanya perlu dikembangkan melalui pembaruan hukum yang lebih adaptif terhadap keberagaman budaya dan berlandaskan prinsip keadilan serta penghormatan terhadap hak asasi manusia.
References
Adil, Muhammad, and Syahril Jamil. “Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Polemics and Perspectives of Religious Leaders and Community Organizations.” Religion & Human Rights 18, no. 1 (March 27, 2023): 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-bja10031.
Aldyan, Arsyad, Kartika Asmanda Putri, Rizal Akbar Aldyan, and Abdelrahman Alasttal. “Local Wisdom-Based Environmental Management Policy in Indonesia: Challenges and Implementation.” Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice 2, no. 3 (December 30, 2024). https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v2i3.100.
Alhkarni, Awis, and Novia Yuriska. “Minangkabau Customary Marriage Traditions: Integration of Custom and Sharia Principles in the Perspective of Islamic Law.” USRATY : Journal of Islamic Family Law 2, no. 2 (December 20, 2024): 124–33. https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v2i2.8834.
Amalia Hulukati, Syafira. “Legal Implications of Prenuptial Agreements in Marriage in Indonesia: Between Protection of Rights and Justice.” Estudiante Law Journal 6, no. 2 (June 20, 2024). https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v6i2.27783.
Cherlin, Andrew J. “Degrees of Change: An Assessment of the Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Thesis.” Journal of Marriage and Family 82, no. 1 (February 5, 2020): 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12605.
Desimaliati, Desimaliati. “Legality of Registration for International Religious Marriage Based on Court Decisions According to Law and Regulations in Indonesia.” Cepalo 6, no. 2 (November 15, 2022): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v6no2.2704.
Dimyati, Khudzaifah, Haedar Nashir, Elviandri Elviandri, Absori Absori, Kelik Wardiono, and Arief Budiono. “Indonesia as a Legal Welfare State: A Prophetic-Transcendental Basis.” Heliyon 7, no. 8 (August 2021): e07865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865.
Fauzia, Ana, Fathul Hamdani, and Deva Octavia. “The Revitalization of the Indonesian Legal System in the Order of Realizing the Ideal State Law.” Progressive Law Review 3, no. 01 (April 1, 2021): 12–25. https://doi.org/10.36448/plr.v3i01.46.
Febrianty, Yenny, Nadya Restu Ryendra, Asmida Ahmad, and Ariyanto Ariyanto. “Legal Reform in Customary Marriage Law in Indonesia and South Africa for Inclusive Justice.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 6, no. 3 (July 31, 2025): 1027–1242. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i3.20896.
GRIJNS, Mies, and Hoko HORII. “Child Marriage in a Village in West Java (Indonesia): Compromises between Legal Obligations and Religious Concerns.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 5, no. 2 (November 5, 2018): 453–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.9.
Katili, Fitri Yanti, Qisthy Leonarza, and Fadlan Fadlan. “Harmonization of Interfaith Marriage Law in Indonesian Legal System : Between Social Reality and Legal Certainty.” International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2, no. 1 (January 9, 2025): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v2i1.155.
Pemerintah Pusat Indonesia. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, Pub. L. No. LN. 1974/ No.1 (1974).
Purwanti, Ani, and Aga Natalis. “Law as Text, Culture as Context: The Semiotics of Marriage Dispensation and Judicial Considerations in Indonesia.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, September 27, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10370-0.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. 19th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
Suhardi, Muhammad. “Legal Pluralism and Cultural Legitimacy: Reframing Sasak Customary Law to Prevent Child Marriage in Lombok.” Society 13, no. 1 (March 31, 2025): 538–52. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.818.
Suryawati, Nany, and Martika Dini Syaputri. “Harmonization of the Application of Customary Law and Positive Law in Village Communities of Malang Regency.” International Journal of Applied Business and International Management 6, no. 2 (August 20, 2021): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v6i2.993.
Syarifah, Masykurotus, and Muhammad Mujib Karim. “The Impact of Marriage Harmonization on Gender Equality in Indonesian Society.” The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law 5, no. 1 (April 28, 2024): 34–53. https://doi.org/10.51675/jaksya.v5i1.758.
Thalib, Mutia Cherawaty. “Implications of Mixed Marriage in the Perspective of Gorontalo Customary Law and Its Reality Based on International Private Law Principles.” Jambura Law Review 5, no. 1 (January 30, 2023): 179–98. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i1.16798.
Wardi, Utama, Yaswirman Yaswirman, Ismail Ismail, and Gafnel Gafnel. “Comparative Analysis of Islamic Family Law and Customary Law in the Settlement of Inheritance Disputes in Indonesia.” Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies 3, no. 1 (July 9, 2024): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v3i1.330.
Widihastuti, Setiati, Iffah Nurhayati, Puji Wulandari Kuncorowati, and Chandra Dewi Puspitasari. “A Shift of Inheritance Tradition in Batak Migrant Communities in Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan 21, no. 1 (April 30, 2024): 41–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i1.71621.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Diafra Banowati, Yohan Dwi Prasetyo, Lies Kussetyowati, Yosua Nugroho Yadiyanto, M. Habib, S.Pd.I, M.Pd.I (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial purposes.
- Adaptation — mixing, changing, and developing materials for any purpose, even commercial ones.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.



