Taking a Step Back to Look at Our Political System: Does a System of Democracy Actually Exist?
(Melihat Kembali Sistem Politik Kita: Apakah Sistem Demokrasi Benar-Benar Ada?)
Keywords:
Democracy, Iron Law of Oligarchy, Indonesian PoliticsAbstract
Democracy is often regarded as the most legitimate system of government, yet in practice many democratic states experience a decline in substantive democratic values. Indonesia, as one of the world’s largest democracies, faces similar challenges marked by elite domination, weakening of accountability institutions, and the suppression of political criticism. This study aims to analyze whether genuine democracy truly exists in Indonesia by examining the relevance of Robert Michels’ Iron Law of Oligarchy in explaining contemporary political conditions. The research employs a socio-legal method using historical, political, and legal approaches to understand democratic development and institutional practices in Indonesia. The findings show that political power is increasingly concentrated among elite groups through legal control, legislative domination, media concentration, and the criminalization of dissent. These conditions strongly support Michels’ argument that democratic systems inevitably tend toward oligarchic control, making democracy more procedural than substantive in practice.
Abstrak
Demokrasi sering dianggap sebagai sistem pemerintahan yang paling sah dan ideal, namun dalam praktiknya banyak negara demokratis mengalami kemunduran nilai-nilai demokrasi substantif. Indonesia sebagai salah satu negara demokrasi terbesar di dunia menghadapi tantangan serupa yang ditandai oleh dominasi elite, melemahnya lembaga pengawas, serta pembungkaman kritik politik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah demokrasi yang sesungguhnya masih ada di Indonesia dengan mengkaji relevansi teori Iron Law of Oligarchy dari Robert Michels dalam menjelaskan kondisi politik kontemporer. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode socio-legal dengan pendekatan historis, politik, dan hukum untuk memahami perkembangan demokrasi serta praktik kelembagaan di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kekuasaan politik semakin terkonsentrasi pada kelompok elite melalui kontrol hukum, dominasi legislatif, konsentrasi media, dan kriminalisasi kritik. Kondisi ini memperkuat pandangan Michels bahwa sistem demokrasi cenderung bergerak menuju oligarki, sehingga demokrasi lebih bersifat prosedural daripada substantif.
References
Aristotle. Politics A4 - Reeve, C.D.C. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998.
Aspinall, Edward, Diego Fossati, Burhanuddin Muhtadi, and Eve Warburton. “Elites, Masses, and Democratic Decline in Indonesia.” Democratization 27, no. 4 (May 18, 2020): 505–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1680971.
Aspinall, Edward, and Marcus Mietzner, eds. “Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society.” Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, 2010.
Diamond, Larry. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26, no. 1 (2015): 141–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009.
Finley, M I. Democracy Ancient and Modern. Rev. ed. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1985.
Ginsburg, Tom, and Aziz Z Huq. How Democracies Die Constitutionally. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
Hadiz, Vedi R. Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
Held, David. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
Huntington, Samuel P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
Indrayana, Denny. Indonesian Constitutional Reform 1999–2002. Jakarta: Kompas Book Publishing, 2008.
Kim, Harris Hyun-soo, and Chaeyoon Lim. “From Virtual Space to Public Space: The Role of Online Political Activism in Protest Participation during the Arab Spring.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 60, no. 6 (December 16, 2019): 409–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715219894724.
Lebert, Joanne. “Information and Communication Technologies and Human Rights Advocacy: The Case of Amnesty International.” In Civil Society in the Information Age, 19–36. Routledge, 2018.
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown, 2018.
Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Michels, Robert. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Hearst’s International Library, 1915.
———. “The Iron Law of Oligarchy.” In Power in Modern Societies, 111–24. Routledge, 2019.
Mietzner, Marcus. Money, Power, and Ideology. Flipside Digital Content Company Inc., 2013.
Mills, C Wright. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press, 1956.
Mosca, Gaetano. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939.
Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
Ober, Josiah. Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
Pareto, Vilfredo. The Rise and Fall of the Elites. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1991.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. London: Penguin, 1968.
Tilly, Charles. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Warburton, Eve, and Edward Aspinall. “Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 41, no. 2 (2019): 255–85. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/221595.
Nanda Puspitasari Wardoyo, and Aris Prio Agus Santoso. 2026. “Asset Forfeiture As an Instrument for Recovering State Losses: Implications for Combating Corruption in Indonesia: (Perampasan Aset Sebagai Instrumen Pemulihan Kerugian Negara: Implikasi Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia)”. SYMPHONIA: Journal of Theory and Research Output 1 (1): 218-27. https://darulilmijournal.com/index.php/symphonia/article/view/124
Winters, Jeffrey A. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ardhes Blandhivay Leuanan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial purposes.
- Adaptation — mixing, changing, and developing materials for any purpose, even commercial ones.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
