Ecological Discourse Construction in Qur’anic Verses on the Earth: A Semitic Rhetorical Analysis

Authors

  • Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi Universitas Darussalam Gontor Author
  • Ali Mahfuz Munawar Universitas Darussalam Gontor Author
  • Ahmad Fadly Rahman Akbar Universitas Darussalam Gontor Author
  • Wahyu Seprianto Universitas Darussalam Gontor Author
  • Mujib Abdurrahman Universitas Darussalam Gontor Author
  • Eci Lestarinda Universitas Darussalam Gontor Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14804/daqiyah.v1i1.112

Keywords:

Environmental Ethics, Khalifah, Qur’anic Ecology, Rhetorical Structure, Semitic Rhetorical Analysis

Abstract

Amid escalating global environmental crises, religious texts are increasingly revisited as ethical resources rather than merely doctrinal references. While the Qur’an articulates foundational principles governing the human–nature relationship, most Qur’anic ecological studies remain thematic and normative, paying limited attention to linguistic and rhetorical construction. This study aims to examine how ecological messages are rhetorically structured and emphasized in the Qur’an through Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA). Employing qualitative library research, the study integrates ecological interpretation with rhetorical analysis of Qur’an Surah Al-A’rāf [7]: 56, Surah Al-Baqarah [2]: 205, Surah Al-Rūm [30]: 41, and Surah Al-An’ām [6]: 165. The findings demonstrate that concentric, parallel, and concentric-parallel patterns systematically reinforce prohibitions against environmental corruption (fasād), highlight the causal link between human actions and ecological damage, and affirm human stewardship (khilāfah). This study argues that Qur’anic rhetorical structures function as persuasive pedagogical mechanisms for cultivating a balanced and sustainable Islamic environmental ethic.

Abstrak
Di tengah eskalasi krisis lingkungan global, teks-teks keagamaan semakin dikaji sebagai sumber etika, bukan sekadar rujukan doktrinal. Meskipun Al-Qur’an mengandung prinsip-prinsip fundamental yang mengatur hubungan manusia dan alam, kajian ekologi Al-Qur’an selama ini cenderung bersifat tematik-normatif dan kurang memperhatikan konstruksi linguistik serta retorisnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana pesan-pesan ekologis Al-Qur’an disusun dan ditekankan secara retoris melalui pendekatan Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA). Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif berbasis studi kepustakaan, penelitian ini mengintegrasikan tafsir ekologis dengan analisis retoris terhadap Al-Qur’an Surah Al-A’rāf [7]: 56, Surah Al-Baqarah [2]: 205, Surah Al-Rūm [30]: 41, dan Surah Al-An’ām [6]: 165. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pola retoris konsentris, paralel, dan konsentris-paralel secara sistematis menegaskan larangan kerusakan lingkungan (fasād), hubungan kausal antara perilaku manusia dan kerusakan alam, serta tanggung jawab manusia sebagai khalifah di bumi. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa struktur retoris Al-Qur’an berfungsi sebagai mekanisme pedagogis-persuasif dalam membangun etika lingkungan Islam yang berorientasi pada keseimbangan dan keberlanjutan.

References

Abdillah, Mujiyono. Agama Ramah Lingkungan Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Paramadina, 2015.

Abdurrahman. ‘Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan Dalam Pendidikan Islam’. Adabuna : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran 3, no. 2 (2024): 102–13. https://doi.org/10.38073/adabuna.v3i2.1563.

Al-Qurṭubī. Al-Jāmiʿ Li-Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. 2nd edn. Vol. 14. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah, 1964.

Al-Razi, Fakhrudin. Mafātīḥ Al-Ghayb,. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.

Ardhana, I Putu Gede. ‘Kajian Kerusakan Sumberdaya Hutan Akibat Kegiatan Pertambangan’. Ecotrophic 6, no. 2 (2011): 87–91.

‘Ashur, Ibn. Al-Taḥrīr Wa al-Tanwīr. Tunis: Dār al-Tunisiyyah, 1984.

Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq. Mengenal Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) Dalam Kajian Al-Qur’an Kontemporer. Literasi Nusantara, 2022.

———. ‘Penerapan Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) Pada Surah Al-Qiyamah’. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 8, no. 1 (2018): 143–69.

———. ‘Re-Analyzing the Structure of Surah al-“Alaq Using Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA): A Critical Study on Cuypers” Methodology of Analyzing Qur’anic Structure’. QURANICA - International Journal of Quranic Research 13, no. 1 (June 2021): 1.

Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq, Deki Ridho Adi Anggara, and Muhammad Dini Syauqi Al Madani. ‘Islamisasi Metode Barat Dalam Studi Al-Qur’an: Studi Kasus Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA)’. Reflektika 18, no. 2 (2023): 226–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.28944/reflektika.v18i2.1283.

Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq, Husein Aziz, and Achmad Murtafi Haris. ‘Investigating Cohesiveness of QS. Al-Mā’idah: A Review on Michel Cuypers Implementation of Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA)’. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 23, no. 1 (March 2022): 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2022.2301-03.

Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq and Idri. ‘Examining Semitic Rhetoric: A Qur’anic Sciences Perspective’. Jurnal Ushuluddin 28, no. 2 (December 2020): 2. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i2.9898.

Asrori, M., M. Muhammad, M.Z.N. Yaqin, W. Firyal, and F. Wahidah. ‘Water Conservation in the Qur’anic Perspective: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Water Usage in Purification Rituals’. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 23, no. 3 (2025): 35–47. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5854.

Bakar, S.A., H. Hussin, M.A.S. Rozani, and Z.A.S. Ahmad. ‘Environmental Ethics in the Qur’an: A Thematic Analysis of Conservation and Stewardship’. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 2025, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI122025-3.

Cuypers, Michel. A Qur’anic Apocalypse A Reading of the Thirty-Three Last Surahs of the Qur’an. Library Of Congress, 2001.

———. ‘Semitic Rhetoric as a Key to the Question of the Naẓm of the Qur’anic Text’. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 13, no. 1 (April 2011): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2011.0003.

Djazuli, Saefudin. ‘Konsep Islam Tentang Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup’. Jurnal Bimas Islam 7, no. 11 (2014): 340.

Halawa Wahyuni, Sri Lola. ‘Pengaruh Perubahan Iklim Terhadap Keanekaragaman Hayati Di Kawasan Tropis’. PENARIK: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Dan Perikanan 02, no. April (2025): 63–64. https://doi.org/ISSN%25203063-6469%2520(E).

Hilabi, Abdurrahman. ‘Dakwah Lingkungan Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Perubahan Iklim’. Syiar: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam 3, no. 1 (2023): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54150/syiar.v3i1.195.

Jadda, A.A.T., A. Hamid, and M.Y. Wahid. ‘Concept and Architecture of Al-Quran Legal Values in Environmental Management’. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 22, no. 2 (2024): 3755–66. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00273.

Jainuddin, Nanang. ‘Hubungan Antara Alam Dan Manusia Menurut Pandangan Islam’. MUSHAF JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Hadis 3, no. 2 (2023): 292–98. https://doi.org/e-ISSN:%25202809-3712.

Jamal, K., J. Syafitri, A. Akbar, H. Ismail, M. Afrizal, and M. Yasir. ‘Theology of Marine Ecosystems from the Perspective of the Al-Qur’an and Its Relevance to Indonesia for Marine Areas Strengthening Pursuant to Law No. 32 of 2014’. Pharos Journal of Theology 106, no. 3 (2025): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3015.

Karman, Karman, Rosihon Anwar, and Lukman Hakim. ‘The Qur’anic Learning Based on Islamic Eco-Theology at Pesantren’. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 9, no. 2 (December 2023): 169–86. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v9i2.24933.

Karman, Rully Agung Yudhiantara, and Asep Muhyidin. ‘The Qur’an and The Earth: Qur’anic Reception Among Pesantren Residents toward Environmental Conservation’. Ulumuna 29, no. 1 (2025): 310–38. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v29i1.1127.

Kartodihardjo, Hariadi. Kembali Ke Jalan Lurus. Edited by Hariadi Kartodihardjo. Forci Development, 2012.

Koláček, J. ‘The Qurʼān as a Source for Contemporary Islamic Environmental Ethics’. Archiv Orientalni 88, no. 2 (2020): 221–48. https://doi.org/10.47979/aror.j.88.2.221-248.

Maknun, Djohar. ‘Ekologi: Populasi, Komunitas, Ekosistem Mewujudkan Kampus Hijau Asri, Islami, Dan Ilmiah’. In Buku, 1–2. 2017.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018.

Muhammad, M., M.Z.N. Yaqin, F.K.R. Mahfud, and F.M.S. Alahmadi. ‘Freedom That Is Not Absolute: Ecological Ethics and Human-Nature Relationship in the Qur’an’. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 22, no. 4 (2024): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5821.

Mustaqim, Abdul. Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir. Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2016.

———. Tafsir Ekologi Relasi Eko-Teologis Tuhan, Manusia, Dan Alam. Damai Banawa Semesta., 2024.

Salim, Abdul Muin. Metodologi Penelitian Tafsir Maudhu’i. Pustaka Arif Jakarta, 2001.

Shihab, Quraish. Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi Dan Peran Wahyu Dalam Keadaan Kehidupan Masyarakat. Bandung: Mizan, 1994.

Shihab Quraish, Muhammad. Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Lentera Hati, Jakarta, 2002.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

Syatha, Abdullah. Al-Qur’an Dan Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018.

Zulhelmi. ‘Konsep Khalifah Fil Ardhi Dalam Perspektif Filsafat (Kajian Eksistensi Manusia Sebagai Khalifah)’. Intizar 24, no. 1 (1970): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v24i1.1879.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi, Ali Mahfuz Munawar, Ahmad Fadly Rahman Akbar, Wahyu Seprianto, Mujib Abdurrahman, and Eci Lestarinda. 2026. “Ecological Discourse Construction in Qur’anic Verses on the Earth: A Semitic Rhetorical Analysis”. Dirasat Qur’aniyyah Wa Hadithiyyah 1 (1): 62-73. https://doi.org/10.14804/daqiyah.v1i1.112.